Introduction of chemical control
The key to a fire ant colony is the queen. Therefore, any control method which does not effectively control the fire ant queen can be considered only a temporary solution to the problem. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) conducted a large-scale control and eradication program against the RIFA by spraying pesticides. Based on the nature of their biology, queens live in the inner part of mounds with heavy protection; therefore, even though fire ants on the soil surface may die immediately after chemical spraying, new members are rapidly created by reproductive queens. Therefore, to effectively control the fire ant, a two-step control method was used in the US.
Step 1. Bait treatment: Bait is broadcast around a mound, and foragers carry the bait into the mound to feed the queen.
Step 2 Individual mound treatments: Chemicals, such as a contact insecticide, or non-chemical methods, such as boiling water or detergent, are applied to eliminate the workers and males, and even queens of mounds.
After many modifications developed in the US and Australia, the method of bait treatment in step one and contact insecticide in step two is considered the best method for controlling fire ants.
Step one: Bait treatment
Most
fire ant bait is made from an insecticide and a lure (generally processed corn
grits coated with soybean oil). Soybean oil is a critical component of bait
that effectively attracts foragers. However, the quality of soybean oil
degrades fast and its power of attraction decreases, so it is recommended that
fresh bait be regularly broadcast. Two major types of chemicals known as insect
growth regulators (IGRs) and toxicants are usually
used with the application of bait.
Many
studies have suggested that regardless of the type of bait used, the control rate
appears to be very similar (85%~95%). However, the 2 types pose major
differences in the length of time it takes to cause a reduction in population
size. Generally speaking, IGRs work more slowly but
are persistent for a longer period so that they effectively control the
expansion of ants.
Forager
ants carry the bait inside the mound and feed the entire colony including
reproductive queens by the process of trophallaxis;
then the accumulated toxic component in queens decreases the fecundity of the
colony. The key for the efficacy of bait is whether or not the insecticide is
transferred to the queen. Successful eradication still needs to involve bait
application although bait is quite expensive. The bait used in the US Australia
includes Fipronil, Pyriproxyfen, Spinosad, Hydramethylnon, Fenoxycarb, and Methoprene.
Because of a lack of bait available in
Taiwan
,
the Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine, Council of
Agriculture, Executive Yuan has imported 3 kinds of bait from the
US
for
emergency purposes.
1.
Fipronil: Interferes with the nervous system of fire ants through contact
and feeding. Significant results may be shown after 2~6 weeks of application.
2.
Pyriproxyfen: An IGR which prevents eggs from hatching. Significant
results may be shown after 1~4 weeks of application.
3.
Spinosyns:
A neural toxicant for fire ants which causes muscle convulsions, paralysis, or prostration. Significant
results may be shown after 1~5 weeks of application.
Methods and considerations for bait application
Frequency
of application: 2~4 times per year.
Dosage: 0.015% Spinosyns bait (
2.8 kg
/ha); 0.00015% Fipronil bait (
1.7 kg
/ha); 0.5% pyriproxyfen bait (
1.7 kg
/ha).
Application
method: Broadcast bait in a large area or treat
individual mounds in a small area (broadcast bait around the mound;
25 g
/mound).
Use fresh bait: It is
preferable to use an unopened container of bait or a container which has been
tightly sealed and not stored for a long period (most bait container labels
suggest its use within 3~6 months after first opening).
Apply when forager ants are actively searching for food. This can be tested by
placing a small amount of bait near an active mound. If ants begin to remove
the bait within 10~30 minutes, then that is a good time to use the bait. Ants
are less active during cold and
hot periods (when the soil temperature is less than
35 °C
or greater than
21 °C
).
Do
not disturb mounds before application. Apply when the ground and grass are dry and rain is not expected for the
next 12~24 hours.
Step two: Individual mound treatments
Chemical
and non-chemical methods may be used for treatment of individual fire ant
mounds. It is better to apply the individual
mound treatments 7~10 days after bait has been broadcast. Dusts, liquid
drenches, granules, and aerosols are all examples of contact insecticides. As a
contact insecticide, these products must actually come into direct contact with
the ant.
i. Dusts
Apply
chemicals formulated as dusts by following the label instructions. Ants will
carry the dust on their bodies and transport the insecticide into the mound
when walking through treated soil. Within a few days, the entire colony should
be killed. To use a dust, distribute the recommended amount evenly over the
mound Products include those containing 75% acephate (Orthene® Fire Ant Killer and Orthene®
75S), 15% acephate (Velocity®), deltamethrin (Deltadust® and Eliminator® Ant Killer Dust), and cyfluthrin (Bayer Advanced Lawn™ Fire Ant Killer).
Granules
To treat a single mound, do not disturb the
mound. It is recommended to measure the required amount in a measuring cup and
sprinkle it around the mound. Use a sprinkling method that breaks the water stream into
droplets and pour 4~8 liters of water over the treated mound if the label
states the product needs to be watered in.
Acephate (Pinpoint® 15), bifenthrin (Talstar®), deltamethrin (Deltaguard™ G), permethrin (Spectracide® Bug Stop Insect Control Granules), and diazinon are all examples of granular contact insecticides
labeled for fire ant control.
Liquids
Some products should be diluted with water and then
applied to the mound. These liquid mound drenches kill the ants underground but
must be applied in sufficient volume. It is recommended that application
penetrates the entire nest using 4~8 liters of a diluted mixture poured over
the top of each mound (Fig. 5). Be sure to wear rubber gloves to avoid contact
with the chemical when handling liquid concentrates
Orthene®, Talstar®, Sevin®, Conserve* SC, and diazinon are examples of liquid contact insecticides.
In order to control
the fire ant, the BAPHIQ has issued some contact insecticides as emergency
chemicals as listed in the following table.
Product name |
Formulation and concentration |
Dilution and amount |
Method |
Fipronil |
0.0143% granules |
97 kg
/ha |
A, B |
0.3% granules |
20 kg
/ha |
A, B |
Chlorpyrifos |
5% granules |
30 kg
/ha |
A, B |
Diazinon |
5% granules |
30 kg
/ha |
A, B |
Permethrin |
10% emulsifiable concentrate |
dilute 3000x |
B |
Cypermethrin |
5% emulsifiable concentrate |
dilute 1500x |
B |
Deltamethrin |
2.8% emulsifiable concentrate |
dilute 3000x |
B |
2.4% emulsifiable concentrate |
dilute 3000x |
B |
Fenvalerate |
0.5% granules |
50 kg
/ha |
A, B |
5% emulsifiable concentrate |
dilute 2000x |
B |
10% emulsifiable concentrate |
dilute 3000x |
B |
20% emulsifiable concentrate |
dilute 4000x |
B |
20% wettable powder |
dilute 5000x |
B |
Propoxur |
5% granules |
36 kg
/ha |
B |
50% wettable powder |
dilute 1000x |
B |
Carbaryl |
5% granules |
30 kg
/ha |
A, B |
39.5% suspension concentrate |
dilute 800x |
B |
40% suspension concentrate |
dilute 800x |
B |
50% wettable powder |
dilute 1000x |
B |
A: Follow standard procedures for
broadcasting the chemical evenly over the infested area and subsequent
watering. Subsequently, irrigate regularly.
B: If an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, or suspension
concentrate is used, it should be diluted with 4~8 liters of water and poured onto
the top of the mound or
30 cm
around the mound. It is better to allow the water to penetrate into entire
mound. If granules are used, spread them evenly on the top of or around the
mound, and then apply water if suggested.
Non-chemical control
i. Control using boiling water
1. Pour boiling water into every mound, as it can kill almost 60% of
individuals.
2. Use at least 5 to 6 liters of water per mound. The boiling water
should reach every corner of the mound.
3. A single treatment of a mound is not sufficient to control fire
ants, but 5~10 days of continuous treatments are required; however, RIFAs can return to the same mounds again.
4. One needs to pay attention to protection measures during the
treatment process, and protect all plants around the mounds from burning
injuries.
ii. Control by flooding
Another non-chemical control
of fire ants is flooding. It can drown ants, but it cannot remove mounds. For
this control method, first excavate a mound from the soil. Then put all of the
material in a bucket filled with water. After 24 hours, almost all ants in the
mound will have died. Operators can face serious attacks from ants when excavating
mounds. Therefore, they should be careful when carrying buckets containing
mound materials. For those reasons, operators need to wear gloves, or use
insecticides to reduce the chances of being bitten by escaping ants. The disadvantage
of this method is that it is not suitable for larger invaded areas.
iii. Biological control
In the
US
, researchers have obtained some
initial results using a biological method of RIFA control, but this technique
is still not mature. It is believed that two biological control agents, a microsporidian and a parasitic phorid fly, native to
South America
have the potential
to control RIFA populations. Although biological control techniques cannot
eradicate RIFA, they can reduce populations, and make local ant species more
competitive.
1.
Parasitic fungus: Microsporidian
Microsporidians are transferred from infected workers to the queen. Infection by
this fungus causes reductions in weight and the egg-laying capacity of a queen which
becomes progressively weaker with time.
Microsporidians can be transferred from infected workers to larvae, and mature
queens can also be infested. After 3 months of microsporidian application, populations will have decreased and may be eradicated within 9~18
months. Researchers have found that some polygyne queens cannot be infected by microsporidians because
of their special immunity system. Microsporidians were
first observed in South America in 1973, and were colonized in the
US
in 1996.
The main reason for using microsporidians to control
RIFA is that it only infects RIFA and BIFA. Microsporidians are species specific, so they are not known to infect other local ant species.
2. Parasitic phorid fly
Parasitic phorid flies can lay their eggs on the body surface of RIFA
workers. Maggots of the phorid fly feed on the head
of the workers and detach the head from the main body. Phorid flies pupate in the head of workers, and adults emerge after 4 weeks of
pupation. Parasitic phorid flies can seriously affect
and reduce the foraging behavior of a RIFA population. Parasitic phorid flies can easily be reared using the RIFA as a host.
3. Control using liquid nitrogen
This
method uses liquid nitrogen at
-196 °C
to freeze fire ants to death. In
this method, high-pressure liquid nitrogen is pumped into most tunnels and
spaces in a nest, and one can expect 100% fire ant population control by
freezing the entire nest.
Advantages
1. Protects the environment: Nitrogen is collected
from the air and liquefied. It has no smell or taste and disperses in the atmosphere
after changing back into a gas.
2. Immediate and rapid action: RIFAs die within a very short period of time.
3. Efficient: It can kill almost all individuals in a
nest.
4. Unaffected by weather: It works very effectively
after a rain.
Disadvantages
1. One needs to know the location of mounds
during the early stage, and it is sometimes very hard to locate nests in order
to control the RIFA.
2. One needs to treat 1 colony at a time.
Single equipment can only control 1 mound at a time. Therefore, this method
cannot be used for a larger invaded area within a short time period.
3. Liquid nitrogen is more expensive. The liquid
nitrogen control method is the most expensive technique compared to all other
currently used techniques for a single mound. This technique will substantially
increase the costs of control.
|